Here is a really great TED Talk about how the internet is changing society, and the battle between free information and property. Larry Lessig makes a really great analogy between how the technology of airplanes affected trespassing laws and how the internet affects copyrighting. He says that in just the same way that common sense tells us that the benefit of transcontinental flights cannot allow land owners to sew airlines for trespassing, the benefit of remixing copyrighted material can't allow 'remixing' internet artists to be silenced or prosecuted for copyright infringement.
Larry Lessig says that both the establishment's view, that all copying is stealing, and the next generation's view, that piracy and breaking the law are acceptable, are wrong. He favors a balanced revision of the law to allow expanded fair use, particularly for amateur productions.
In my opinion, although his framing of the issue is brilliant, he's missed the core of the issue, which is that information IS free now, and there is no way to own it once you've released it. That is why the next generation rebels against the rule of law. The rule of law is outmoded now.
What we need is a new way of looking at intellectual property. In the internet age, the correct way to sell intellectual property, is to advertise that you have something, request pledges, and release it to the world when you have enough pledges that you are justly compensated for your investment in creating the intellectual property. Once you release it, it no longer belongs to you, or the people who paid you, it belongs to everyone. Greed and exposition are now antithetical. Those who create better do it for love. Those who consume better patronize or the art they love will dry up.
Distributors must understand social networking now. Release occurs in the landscape of social interaction. All distribution of information is a pyramid scheme now. When you buy information, you are buying it for your connections as well, and those who are wired in are connected to everyone.